Program Orenco Pump Select Program Settings. Download Psycho 1998 DVDRip CoDeD1337 torrent or any other torrent from Other Movies category. Download Psycho [1998] DVDrip [English] - DAVENET torrent from movies category on Isohunt. Torrent hash: 1034156c9d7fc3e83881bf1b8c4afb.

Reviewed by bob the moo Vote: 5/10 Marion Crane steals $400,000 and is escaping to meet her boyfriend. When she gets tired during a stormy night she stops at the Bates motel. When she goes missing her sister, boyfriend and a private detective start to look for her.

However the Bates motel run by Norman and his mother is a place of many secrets. Remakes are regular things nowadays, but carbon copies are rare. This is a lift in terms of dialogue, shots almost everything at times. The big question is why? As a film in its own right it's not terrible but comparing it to the original it literally pales in comparison (despite the colour!). Why did we need this? Sure on some level it may reach those who haven't seen the original and don't want to watch an 'old' film.

Why should we indulge the multiplexers who refuse to watch anything made before 1991? It's not bad? It's poor a poor relation of the original. In the UK we often get 50th anniversary etc re-releases of old films nationwide (admittedly not in all cinemas), in fact Psycho was out a few years ago. So the idea that a cheap copy is good because it'll help open it up to new audiences. The cast are all OK? Until you watch the original.

Then Vaughn stands out as doing a poor imitation, Heche is nowhere near Leigh and Julianne Moore has too much 'strong woman' baggage from other roles to do well. Admittedly the all-star cast gives weight to the roles that were relatively minor? Macy, Mortensen, Forster, James LeGros, Philip Baker Hall etc? Avaya Vpn Client Xp.

Although really the question is why they all queued up to be in this toss! Overall it's so-so as a film. However when you compare it to the original it's really a poor show and, because it's a carbon copy, you can't help but compare it line for line, scene for scene, actor for actor. What was the point? Reviewed by Peanuthead Vote: 5/10 This is easily the worst remake in film history. I have never understood the idea of a remake at all.

If a film, like Psycho, is so good to start with why on earth do you want to try and improve on it? If you insist on tampering with perfection, why then do you have to try to recreate it in it's whole? There is nothing original here. Gus Van Sant put nothing of himself into this film. They say imitation is the highest form of flattery, but this is ridiculous. There are a lot of sides to a character as complex as Norman Bates, and I suspect that Vaughn may have wanted to explore them. Instead Van Sant forced him into sticking to a cheap imitation of Anthony Perkins.